1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual 20% from June 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015, and the following.

1. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for the payment of the agreed amount on July 9, 2008 (Seoul District Court Decision 2008Gadan96518), and November 28, 2008, "the defendant shall pay 55 million won to the plaintiff by May 31, 2009. If the defendant does not pay the above money by the due date, the remaining amount obtained by subtracting the money paid from KRW 100 million to the due date by the due date and the delay damages calculated at a rate of 20% per annum from June 1, 2009 to the date of full payment, and the defendant can be acknowledged as having concluded an adjustment to the effect that "the plaintiff waives the remaining claims," and the defendant did not pay 50 million won to the plaintiff by May 31, 2009.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 100,000,00 as well as damages for delay calculated by the rate of 20% per annum from June 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015, and 15% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim seeking the extension of the prescription period of the claim under the conciliation protocol is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.