Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A around January 2013, Defendant A prepared a document stating the “written confirmation of the application for the issuance of resident registration certificates” using his/her Nowon-gu Seoul Building D (207), using his/her Nowon-gu computer, and affixed the official seal of the head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in the name column, “E”, “F” in the resident registration number column, “F” in the resident registration number column, “Seoul Metropolitan Government Songpa-gu G” in the issuance number column, “2013.03.03” in the date of application, “03.02.03.03” in the valid date column, and “01.03.03.” in the confirmation date column, Defendant A signed and sealed the above head of the Dong by means of attaching the image file, which is the image of the head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dong, which was created in advance after imageing Defendant B’s photograph on the photograph column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, Defendant A forged the certificate of application for issuance of the resident registration certificate (Evidence No. 1) under the name of the head of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Oral Dong.

B. From January 2013, Defendant A, a teacher of the display of forged official document, had a test on February 2 through March 3, 2013 to Defendant B on several occasions, and the tendency to draw questions is examined instead of the other person’s name.

On the other hand, fine is to be imposed by introducing extra-placement in the following month.

“The consent was obtained from Defendant B.”

Defendant

A around 09:00 on February 3, 2013, around 09:0, around 09:00, up to his own car towards the I University located in Chuncheon, Defendant B had Defendant B undergo the TOEL test under the name of E with the certificate of application for issuance of forged resident registration certificates, and had the supervisor present the certificate as if the certificate was duly completed.

After all, Defendant A, at around 09:30 on the same day, was a document duly formed by Defendant B, at the third floor TPPL test site in the future of the said I University, and the test supervisor, as above, the certificate of application for issuance of resident registration certificates was signed by the test supervisor.