Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Although a person, other than a pharmacy founder, who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act due to the sale of an unqualified drug, was prohibited from selling any drug, the Defendant purchased the medicine from a person who was on the part of his/her name, such as viglass and eggs, etc., which is an advance donation treatment medicine around July 2010, and then sold the medicine on the part of a person who, on the part of his/her own, posted it on a vehicle, etc. to the effect that the medicine is sold, and sold the medicine to the person who reported the sale

The Defendant, around August 2, 2010, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seoul Jung-gu E and 401(F) in Seoul Jung-gu, sent the name of the Defendant without permission, and sent the name of the Defendant via a door-to-door distribution to G, who had contacted, and KRW 2.40,000,000 from the face-to-face transfer to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number:H) in the name of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant sold drugs, as seen above, to June 13, 2013, including the sale of drugs by a pharmacy founder, and sold drugs for pre-donation treatment, including 23,609,00 won, over 139 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

B. Although a person, other than a pharmacy founder, who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act due to the acquisition of an unqualified drug, was prohibited from acquiring drugs for sale, the Defendant acquired around July 23, 2013, around July 23, 2013, the following: (a) from a person who was unable to obtain his/her name from his/her person in the vicinity of the food frame of Seoul subway No. 7, Seoul subway Line 1,522; and (b) kept them in the Defendant’s residence.

C. Notwithstanding the fact that a pharmacist or herb pharmacist is not a pharmacist or herb pharmacist in violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act due to the preparation of an unqualified drug, the Defendant, around September 19, 201, mixed the Defendant’s residence in the Defendant’s place of residence as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a), mixed the “non-ava” containing the prescription drugs, and the “Mamanman 100” purchased on the Internet, and then, in the Internet shopping mall, etc.