Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From December 1, 2011 to the present date, from the beginning of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the “G medical care center” and the “H welfare center” that provide visiting medical care to the elderly among the medical care facilities for the aged, among the medical care facilities for the aged, who run the “G medical care center” and the “H welfare center for the aged,” and the Defendant B from August 17, 201 to March 31, 2015, the fathercheon-gu from August 31, 2011 to June 31, 2015, operated the “I medical care center” as a communal living home for the aged among the medical care facilities for the aged among the six floors in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant C from December 1, 2012 to the present from the 8th floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the “K medical care center” and the “L medical care center.

In order to contribute to the strengthening of fire safety of vulnerable welfare facilities and the revitalization of the regional economy in around 2013, the Defendants made an opportunity for the government to implement the automatic fire detection equipment, automatic fire detection equipment, automatic fire screening equipment, simplified stringr, powder decentralization, etc. with the budget of 40% of the national expenses, 40% of the city expenses, 20% of its own expenses, and 20% of its own expenses, and applied for the subsidies for the strengthening of fire-fighting equipment function with the disabled and the senior citizens of the Seocheon-gu Office without the intent of the government to bear the amount equivalent to 20% of their own expenses among the construction expenses, but without the intent of the government to make the amount equivalent to 20% of their own expenses, the Defendants were entitled to receive the subsidies for the strengthening of fire-fighting function by falsely submitting the application for the subsidies as if the Defendants were carrying out the construction with the burden of 20% of their own expenses to the disabled and the person in charge.

1. Defendant A around December 12, 2013, with the disabled who is the victim senior citizens, Defendant A paid 80% subsidies for strengthening the function of the fire-fighting equipment and 20% self-paid funds by the person in charge of the fire-fighting function reinforcement project, with a simplified sprinkler of “G medical care center” operated by the person in charge of the fire-fighting function reinforcement project.