logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.02.18 2019고정174
퇴거불응등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 17:40 on October 9, 2018, the Defendant received a demand from the victim that the Defendant would not open a door between the Defendant and the said house when the victim was diving and would not open the house.

However, the defendant does not respond to it and until he is arrested as a flagrant offender with a police officer dispatched by a report by the victim at around 18:20 on the same day until he is arrested as a flagrant offender, the defendant shall take the victim out of the victim's house by leakage above about 40 minutes.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

around 19:30 on December 28, 2018, the Defendant, “2019 Highly 261”, at around 19:30 on December 28, 2018, put the victim of female-friendly job offering who lives together under the influence of alcohol in the room F of “E”, which is the residence of the Defendant located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, and the victim made a 112 report on the cell phone, but the victim got off the cell phone at the expense of KRW 170,00,000 on the victim’s market price, thereby putting it in the toilet change.

Summary of Evidence

"2019, 174"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. "2019, 261" of the offender's branch;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel shall leave the victim from the victim's place of damage, his/her photograph, investigation report, etc., and the report processing statement 112;

There is no Gu received, and even if there was a request for eviction, the defendant is the joint possession right who has the right to reside in the house, such as paying living expenses to the victim, and thus, the defendant does not constitute a crime of eviction, and the defendant does not have any fact of damaging the victim's cell phone.

First of all, according to the evidence of the judgment, the victim C is the lessee's name with respect to the building B and G in Ulsan-gu, and the tenant's name.

arrow