All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) lies in the fact that the Defendants visited F Office Co., Ltd. to receive the return of the investment money from the victim E, and met the victim E on the date stated in the facts constituting the crime of the original judgment. However, the Defendants did not threaten the victim E or interfere with the victim’s business by making a sound to the employees as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the original judgment, harming the customer E or presenting correspondence

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the judgment of the court below and the court below and the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the defendants are sound as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the court below. Defendant A threatened the victim E with the fiduciary, and Defendant B produced a letter in his arms, and Defendant B threatened the victim with disturbance by jointly avoiding disturbance, such as a slick distance between the offices, and thereby threatening the victim, and interfere with the victim’s business by force.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

(1) Former employees of the F Co., Ltd. operated by the victim E and the victim E.

H and I appeared as a witness in the original trial, and testified. Each statement is considerably specific, relatively consistent, and most consistent.

In addition, on the day of the instant case, the Defendants received a letter of loan from the victim E to pay the investment amount invested by G from July 20, 2013, and H and I reported or entered the victim E office, but did not make it due to Defendant B.

In light of the fact that statements are made, credibility exists.

② The Defendants made a false statement by the victim E for the purpose of criminal punishment against the Defendants, and H and I made a false statement as the victim E’s will.

However, in light of the fact that the victim E did not file a complaint against the Defendants, and the fact that H and I retired all of the above companies at the time of the testimony of the court below, the defendants asserted.