1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasoning for the statement in this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that for the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of some contents as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

B. The following shall be added to the part added or dried up to five folds at the fifth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance:

In addition, the written disposition of this case contains a statement that the plaintiffs decided whether to grant permission for development activities through deliberation by the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Planning Committee, and that the plaintiffs received a notice of the above disposition and filed an objection against the defendant around September 18, 2015 with the content of disputing the grounds for the disposition of this case (see subparagraph 17-1 of this case). (See subparagraph 17-2 of the above evidence), the defendant rejected the plaintiffs' application through deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee pursuant to Article 59 (1) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.

The text of the judgment of the first instance is 8th 14 and 15th 15th 15th 200, “in the vicinity of a correctional institution for the unification”.

The following shall be added to the 11th sentence following the 3th sentence:

The plaintiffs asserts to the purport that the instant disposition is unlawful, since the J Village creation plan on the part of the filing site of this case is impossible to secure financial resources and it is difficult to pass through the deliberation of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Planning Deliberation Committee.

It is difficult to conclude that there is no possibility of realizing a funding plan for the development of the J Village in light of the estimated project cost required for the implementation of the development plan of the J Village, the details of the entire budget and investment cost of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In addition, the defendant designated some areas as urban planning facilities (cultural facilities) on April 2016 as part of M history, culture and tourism display project.