1.(a)

Defendant E. who is a foundation that is the taking over of the lawsuit of Plaintiff A, a foundation that has been changed in exchange in this court.

Ⅰ. The reasoning for this part of this Court’s reasoning is as follows, except for the part that was used by the court from September to 19 of the judgment of the first instance as follows, the corresponding part of the “basic facts I.” As such, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the corresponding part of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Use]

C. Party 1 related to the ownership and management of the building) Defendant G’s Intervenor P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Intervenor P”)

) The building of AC block AC block located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant building”).

2) The R Management Body is a contractor of the building of this case and the owner of the building of this case, which is a contractor of the building of this case, such as a refratulation, and the owner of the building of this case. (2) The R Management Body is a management body composed of all sectional owners of the building of this case for the purpose of implementing the management of the building of this case

3) N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”)

The company is a company that performed services on the maintenance and management of the building of this case at the request of the R management body.

Ⅱ. The plaintiffs' assertion and the defendants' assertion in the trial of the court of the first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance.

The reasoning of this Court concerning this part is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for deletion of 4 to 18 to 2, 18 to 10, 19 to 6 to 10, and 19 to 10, respectively, is as follows: (b) the reasoning of the first instance judgment is as follows: (c) the corresponding part of the allegations by the parties is the same; and (d) the same shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

Ⅲ The reasoning for this part of the Court’s establishment of a joint tort is as follows: (a) the establishment of a joint tort is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, 31 pages 8; and (b) the establishment of a joint tort is limited to the establishment of a joint tort as follows; and (c) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, 31 pages 9, as follows.