The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) shall be excessively unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, each damage is relatively minor, and the defendant is in a position to support his/her family who is administered, each of the crimes of this case shall be taken into account when the defendant is aware of the intention or ability to pay the consideration, and the crime of this case shall be taken into account two times in the absence of the intention or ability to pay the consideration, and the crime of this case shall be committed by the police station without any particular reason, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the defendant has been punished several times in the past, and each of the crimes of this case was committed during the repeated offense, even during the repeated offense period, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, including the fact that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims, and there was no special reason to change the sentencing after the sentence was sentenced (at least one year) and the scope of imprisonment with prison labor according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee (at least one year) and other defendant's age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.