logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.04.19 2016고단2768
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 22, 2009, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act twice as a person who was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime from the Sejong District Court House on February 18, 2009 to a person who violated the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Flag Flag.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant committed on July 13, 2016 is a person who is engaged in driving a driver car B.

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.240% during blood transfusions on July 15:30, 2016, and led to two-lanes from the west on which the two-lane road in front of the intersection of Pyeongtaek-si is located in the galking of Pyeongtaek-si Eup.

Since there is a high speed of vehicle traffic, there was a duty of care to see a person engaged in driving service and to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the brake system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding without neglecting it, and the part of the victim C (33 Do) driving at the front of the signal waiting vehicle in front of the Defendant, which was driven by the Defendant as part of the lower part of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle in front of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant driven the above vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury, such as the crypum dump, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment, to the victim.

2. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 16:34 on July 14, 2016, driven a B-type car at the section of approximately 20 meters of the road of Pyeongtaek apartment, which is located in Pyeongtaek-si stability Eup, in the influence of alcohol content of 0.229%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. The circumstantial report on the driver of each driving school;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of alcohol;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each photograph;

1. A previous conviction: a written inquiry, and a written reply.

arrow