logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.09.07 2018고단679
절도미수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of 2018 senior group 679, and imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of 2018 senior group 899 decided.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for one year from the date of imprisonment with prison labor for intrusion on a structure at night, larceny, etc. in the Jinwon District Court's Jinwon Branch on May 18, 2018, and on May 26, 2018, the Defendant was in total of six times the record of the same larceny

around 12:45 on March 31, 2018, the Defendant, “E” operated by the victim D in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, 2018, opened several doors and intrudes into the said private teaching institute on several occasions by using any cres in the said private teaching institute, and used the entrance to be corrected, and then used the lecture room to return the lecture room to the said private teaching institute and embling the goods to be stolen, the Defendant fledd through the victim who returned to the private teaching institute and the toilet window of the said private teaching institute.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd on a structure managed by the victim, and attempted to steals the victim's property, but did not bring about the intent.

"2018 Highest 899"

1. On July 4, 2018, the Defendant habitually intruded with a entrance opened at the “H Beauty Teaching Institutes” in the victim G management of the 16:20th, Sacheon-si F and the second floor on July 4, 2018, and cut off the sum of KRW 1.50,000,000, the victim’s resident registration certificate, and KRW 50,000,000,00,000.

2. On July 13, 2018, at around 11:30 on July 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a cosmetic, the entrance door, and opened a door to cosmetic; and (b) obstructed the objects to be stolen by intrusion; (c) was sent to K by a security company, a security company, who was dispatched after receiving an external intrusion signal; and (d) did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, or K;

1. CCTV images;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (the same type of crime records);

1. Relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment (Attempted thief), Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the Criminal Act.

arrow