logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2013.04.09 2013고단15
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Nos. 3 through 6 of seized evidence from Defendant A and seized evidence 1.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 24, 2003, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Gwangju District Court for six months, and on January 26, 2010, Defendant A was released on May 25, 2012 and the parole period passed on October 11, 2012 while sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Southern District Court in the Southern District Court.

Defendant

B was issued by the Gwangju District Court on July 23, 2007 a summary order of KRW 2 million for larceny, and on January 26, 2010, the period of parole passed on March 30, 201 after being released on March 10, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 5, 2012, the Defendants’ co-principaled the Defendants in front of “E” located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, on December 5, 2012. At the same time, the Defendants opened the outer wall of the said Ethy site to the Raber prepared in advance, intruded into the outer wall of the said Ethy site, and then cut off the amount equivalent to KRW 1,020,000 from the market price owned by the victim F.

In addition, during the period from around that time to February 6, 2013, the Defendants habitually stolen old wires of the sum of KRW 16,747,00 in 11 times in the same way as indicated in the annexed List of Crimes, and attempted to steals old wires of the sum of KRW 16,747,00.

2. On December 5, 2012, Defendant A discovered that the Poter freight has been parked in the open space of “E” as indicated in paragraph (1), and opened the door of an unrectable vehicle, Defendant A taken out one solution of the market price of 2.50,00 won owned by the victim F.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H and F;

1. A written statement prepared by I, J, and K;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Previouss before ruling: A inquiry report, such as each criminal record, an investigation report (the confirmation date of the release date related to a repeated crime);

arrow