1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The following facts are either of the parties to a dispute or may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, and 8:

The Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Carryover (hereinafter referred to as the "Carryover of this case") is a multi-household house with a total of 43 households with the size of 1st underground and 4th underground floors (D, E, F, G Dong).

B. The Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on December 8, 2015, with respect to the instant Carryover E-dong H (hereinafter “instant housing”).

C. On September 2016, 2016, a large number of patrolmen had taken place. The instant housing that the Plaintiff resided in was flooded due to the shortage of water distribution in sewage pipes to discharge the daily sewage of the instant CGra, and due to the concealment and construction of the Manle, which was installed at the intersection of the road, caused flood.

The Plaintiff, from September 21, 2016 to October 6, 2016, performed the repair work of the said sewage culvert three times, and paid a total of KRW 4,350,000 in construction cost.

(hereinafter “instant construction cost”). (e) The construction cost of this case

1) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, the head of the instant CBDD, seeking payment of the instant construction cost, etc. by Seoul Northern District Court 2017Gaso2583, which was the Seoul Northern District Court. In the said litigation procedure, the Plaintiff conducted an appraisal in order to verify the causes of flood damage to the instant housing, and KRW 3.3 million of the appraisal cost on June 21, 2017 (hereinafter “the appraisal cost of the instant case”).

2) On October 19, 2017, the instant construction cost is equally borne by the residents of the four units of CBD in equal shares. The appraisal cost of the instant case is calculated by calculating the amount of settlement recommendation to be borne by the residents of four units of CBD and I in equal shares. “I shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 1,747,500,000 if the sum of the amounts within the scope of the instant CBD D management cost managed by I is added to KRW 1,747,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.