Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are persons engaged in each working day.

At around 22:45, August 22, 2016, the Defendants: (a) 22:45, at the E main station located in Nam-gu, Busan, and (b) 112, Defendant A expressed a speech that “I am home, by paying a drinking value” from the victim G, the police box belonging to the police station of the Southern Police Station, who was called upon the above main station’s 112 report, and “I am home,” who called “I am home, by paying a drinking value”; (c) Defendant A took a bath to read “I am, I am, I am, I am,” and Defendant B took a bath to read “I am, I am, I am am,” and Defendant B am spawd with the police’s body by hand.

In the end, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the police officer's legitimate 112 report processing duties, and at the same time, they jointly interfered with the victim G with the victim G, causing injury to the left-hand seller's straw, inspection, etc. requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. The witness H and G respective legal statements;

1. Diagnosis certificates, investigation reports (as to the dispatch status, etc. of the site), and the application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the crime in question, Article 257 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (the following sentencing shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances in mind):

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order is committed by the use of violence to two police officers, who were sent to the police station upon 112 report, without paying the drinking value at the main point, resulting in an injury to one police officer. The crime of this case is not good, and even if so, the Defendants were committed by denying the crime.