logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.07.16 2014고단2224
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 20, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, which became aware of as a customer of the D insurance agency’s work in Ulsan (hereinafter “D insurance agency’s membership in the fund brokerage scheme, may earn a profit higher than the bank interest rate”.

However, the defendant, who received money from the victim, tried to make an investment in E with a multi-level company in which the defendant invested, and did not have any intent or ability to pay profits by subscribing to the fund operated by D.

Nevertheless, on November 12, 2007, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 80 million won from the victim through the Defendant’s agricultural bank account from the victim and acquired the money by deceiving the victim.

2. Around September 26, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at D Offices located in Ulsan-gu F, Ulsan-gu, stating that “The Defendant would give more interest than the bank interest rate if the Defendant invests operating capital in our company.”

However, the defendant was trying to make an investment in E with a multi-level company in which the defendant was making an investment, and there was no intention or ability to pay interest higher than the bank interest rate by investing it with the funds for operating the D company.

Nevertheless, on September 29, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 30 million from the victim with the Defendant’s agricultural bank account from the victim, and acquired it by fraud.

3. Around September 30, 2008, the Defendant found in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, the victim’s residence, and falsely stated that “The Defendant may receive a high interest if it invests in the business run by the D company. It was reported to the company investing in D in this country, and the company is good and good and good. It would be if it trusted and invested in D.”

However, the defendant received money from the victim and tried to make an investment in E with a multi-level company in which the defendant invested.

arrow