1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On October 8, 2003, the defendant company established the business purpose of receiving image chips from the customer company producing the image chips for image chips (hereinafter referred to as the " image chips") on the manufacturing service business of October 8, 2003. The plaintiff entered the defendant company on March 1, 2005, and entered the defendant company to inspect whether the defect in the image chips itself occurred or the defect occurred due to the inflow of dust into the image chips, and retired on August 3, 2007.

B. The Plaintiff’s completion of the instant employee’s invention and patent registration 1) made two inventions, including Q, as an employee’s invention, along with D who had been employed as the head of the Defendant Company’s research institute (hereinafter the following six inventions are indicated by the method, such as the instant employee’s invention 1, and the entire term is collectively referred to as “each employee’s invention.”

The right to obtain a patent is succeeded to the Defendant Company, the employer, and the Defendant Company filed an application for the patent and obtained the patent registration as listed below. The name of the invention(Evidence A 1) invention of this case: Q2: filing date/registration date/R date/ L3: Defendant Company 4) invention of this case refers to the device and method of testing the image license in the form before it is cut in a unit of an individual image, after the creation of a large number of image consensus on the front waferferer, and then cut in a unit of a package of image. In sum, referenced Do 4 attached to the application is made to Do 4, referring to the device of testing the image license in a form of multiple images shamper(s) and 40 square meters(s) shamp(s) 40 square(s).