A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2010, the Defendant admitted the Defendant’s mother E (F) to the “D” medical care center located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. Interference with business;

A. On September 11, 2010, the Defendant issued a clause on the ground that the Defendant was suspected of drinking by any other person, at the room room (the place where the elderly lives together with the living room where the elderly takes a day meal and takes rest) located in the area 9nd floor of the above medical center (B) around September 11, 2010, on the ground that he was in contact with the living room where the elderly takes part in the said medical center for the above medical center for the purpose of E, and how to manage the Defendant’s employees. Whether the instant songs are to follow the employee. Whether there is another person in charge of the management of the said songs. Whether there is another person in charge. The Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s operation of the said medical center by force by taking advantage of the following: (a) the songs and Ra.”

B. On November 20, 2010, the Defendant asserted that the said caregiver was plucking, plucking, or plucking up the arms of E on October 2, 2010 at a room room in the area A (A) of the 9nd floor of the Medical Care Center around November 20, 2010, and that the said caregiver interfered with the operation of the said medical care center by force of the victim, by causing disturbance to avoid disturbance. The inside and outside of the hospital would be hurged. The outside of the hospital would be hurged. The outside of the hospital. The outside of the hospital will be put in a civil petition. The outside of the hospital will be closed. The outside of the hospital will be referred to as “the outside of the hospital.” The operation of the said medical care center was hindered by force.”

C. On December 7, 2010, the Defendant asserted, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1-B, at the same place as “1-B,” and expressed that “the treatment expenses are the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the city, Do, and the head of the Gu