logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.27 2018가합560444
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Seoul Central District Court shall have jurisdiction over the real estate listed in the attached list A from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The grounds for claims specified in the attached Form 6 and the changed grounds for claims shall be as specified in the attached Form 7;

2. Grounds for recognition and applicable provisions of law, Defendant F and G: Judgment by service (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) by public notice (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act): Defendant H: There is no dispute over the judgment by deeming the confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant I submitted only a reply to the purport that Defendant I approved the inheritance limit, and the overall purport of the pleadings (including each number), and the whole purport of the arguments (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant I modified the purport of the claim against Defendant I by reflecting the above inheritance limit approval, and Defendant I did not specifically dispute the above inheritance limit. Accordingly, Defendant I did not dispute about the modified purport of claim)

3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow