beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"200 Highest 244"
1. Around 05:50 on November 6, 2019, the Defendant: (i) 05:50 on the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and (ii) cafeteriaed the victim’s “D” restaurant operated by the victim C (here 39 years of age); (ii) without any justifiable reason, she saw the victim as “Isn husband or her husband, whether Is off this table is cut off, and knick,” and (iii) took a walk and take a bath to the victim; and (iv) by force, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about 20 minutes of the same day, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business, and twice the victim’s buck that continued to restrain it, and caused the victim’s injury, such as dump, dumf, etc., of dumke, which requires medical treatment for about 15 days.
2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time, at the time, at the place, and at the time, at the victim C’s location, and at the restaurant, destroyed and damaged the victim’s outdoor table, which was located in front of the above restaurant, by putting five chairs in the city, with a view to displaying the string of the vehicle, and string three irregular liners in the city under the unstring of the city. At around 06:30 on the same day, the Defendant collected the victim’s outdoor table and chairs, and damaged them by continuously displaying the strings of the unstrings in the city.
"200 Highest 700"
3. At around 03:00 on March 13, 2020, the Defendant: (a) boarded the F taxi operated by Nonparty E; (b) did not pay the fare despite arrival at the destination; and (c) took a bath to the said E without paying the fare; and (d) the said E transferred the vehicle to G zone with the Defendant’s seated to receive police assistance.
On March 13, 2020, the Defendant requested the Defendant to pay the charges and to leave the taxi in front of the G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District G District, which was called out upon the above E’s request on March 13, 2020, and the Defendant continued to pay the charges to I while continuing to pay I.