Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

around 05:00 on October 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had a fluorous dispute with the victim C (27 years old, female-gu) who had been living in Busan Shipping Daegu Btel 102, 3013; (b) had the victim’s left side at one time; and (c) had the victim go beyond the victim, thereby causing the victim to go beyond the victim, thereby causing the victim to suffer damage to the glusity and the glusity of the glusium in need of medical treatment for about one week.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning each prosecutor's office or the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. 상해 진단서, 폭행 피해 부위 사진, 소견서, 사진촬영 시각 확인한 사진 [ 피고인은 ‘ 피해자의 폭행을 막은 사실이 있을 뿐이고 피해자에게 상해를 가한 사실이 없다’ 라는 취지로 주장하였는바, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택 ㆍ 조사한 증거들에 의해 인정되는 사실들에, ① 피해자의 진술 내용이 구체적이고 자연스러운 점, ② 이 사건 당일 07:52 경 촬영한 피해 부위 사진에 의하면, 피해자가 볼 등에 타박상을 입은 사실이 확인되는 점, ③ 피고인도 수사기관에서 ‘ 피해자를 뿅 망치로 때린 사실은 있다.

(4) In a case where it is reasonable to deem that the perpetrator’s act was committed with the intent of attacking the victim’s unfair attack rather than with a view to defending the victim’s unjust attack, and that the perpetrator’s act was committed with the intent of attacking the victim, the perpetrator’s act is not deemed a legitimate defense, in full view of the following: (a) the perpetrator’s act has the nature of the act of attack at the same time as the defensive act; and (b) it cannot be deemed as a legitimate defense (see Supreme Court Decision 2003Do4934, Jun. 25, 2004, etc.).

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;