The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor’s office, the gist of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) may be recognized that the Defendant arbitrarily affixed the seals G and H from G and H without the permission of G and H, to “the minutes of the Committee for the Evaluation of Establishment of New Schools and the Evaluation of Proposals on May 23, 2016”. The lower court determined that: ① G and H stated that “the Defendant did not know how his seal was used, and did not use his seal; ② the instant accusation was made under the lead of non- G and H; ③ the Defendant used his seal illegally; ④ the Defendant’s statement of manager was finalized by the judgment of innocence; ④ the Defendant believed that it is difficult for the Defendant to believe that it was not consistent with the police and this court; ⑤ the Defendant consistently denied the facts charged; and ② the lower court determined that the Defendant’s assertion that it was not reasonable to prove the credibility of the minutes or the evidence presented by the prosecutor is insufficient to the extent that it did not contain any reasonable doubt by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged.

(2) At the time of the investigation into replacement with the Defendant ( November 2, 2017), I stated “the first minutes” himself.