1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 6, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2000, 200,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

B. On September 7, 2010, the Plaintiff and Mameri character concluded a contract for the manufacture and supply of goods on screen screen, and on September 13, 2010, a contract for the production and supply of lighting advertisements respectively.

C. On November 8, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract for the production and installation of goods for screen fishing (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of screen fishing”). On June 22, 201, the contract for the production and installation of lighting advertising equipment (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of lighting advertising”) was entered into on June 22, 201, and the contract for the supply of the instant screen fishing collectively referred to as “each of the instant supply contracts,” and the main contents of each of the above contracts are as follows.

-The contract for the supply of screen fish of this case-

2. Contract amount: KRW 12.65 billion per day (including value-added tax).

3. Contract term: Article 6 (Performance Delay) (1) of the term of contract from November 8, 2010 to February 5, 2012 (Contract Terms) (1) where the Defendant fails to complete the completion of the scheduled completion of the contract without good cause, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff penalty for delay for the period from the following day to the completion date of the scheduled completion of the works.

(2) Compensation for delay shall be calculated by 0.15% (1.5/1,000) of the total project expenses for each history as an allowance for delay exceeding the scheduled completion date of works.