A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:40, driven a Gyeongnam E-M vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.135% in a section of about 4km from the road near the “mental and physical Schlage” to the road near the “D”, located in the Hayang-nam-Eup fishery department at the time of smuggling.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a ma E-car in light of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (E-car) and the Road Traffic Act (E-car after an accident).

On December 14, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.135% in blood, as described in paragraph (1) around 23:40 on December 14, 2015, and driven the said car at a speed of 60 km per hour at the beginning of the eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

At the time, the location was night, and the one-way road was a bend line with a small side of the center line, so a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the operation and steering gear and protecting the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so, and took part of the victim F(57 years old) driving G A half of the G G car driving seat and even door part as the front part of the Defendant’s driving car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a sprinked sprinke, which requires treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant fleded without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person by stopping the vehicle, by making it difficult for the repair cost to be damaged to the extent that the 2,033,854 won, such as a Lpart exchange, would be avoided, even if the drinking operation would be avoided.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's corresponding legal statements 1.