logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.18 2012고단2721 (1)
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:40 on March 25, 2012, C's father D, who received a claim from the victim FF (52 years old), the victim G (25 years old), the victim H (23 years old), and the victim H (23 years old) that he was living before the other's house, was faced with the above F and the F's face at the time of drinking, and C were able to take care of the F's face.

Accordingly, the above G was considered to have the face of G in drinking, and the defendant was also able to take the head of G in his hand and knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kak

In addition, the above H referred to as “Ipson’s superior who died of his wife”, C tried to walk H on the side of H by drinking at one time and by drinking the F’s face one time by driving the F which he saw.

As a result, the Defendant and C jointly inflicted injury on the F, such as the closed eye and upper frame that require approximately 4 weeks of treatment on G, including approximately 6 weeks of treatment, on the right side of the river bed and the river bed, and on the ground that H’s dump dump, which requires approximately 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of F and H:

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each injury diagnosis certificate and diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is likely to be considered in the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and it is recognized that the Defendant made efforts to reach an agreement with the victims by depositing the victim G, etc., but the Defendant committed the instant crime in spite of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime on March 24, 201 and one year of suspended execution, which was during the period of suspended execution.

arrow