logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.11.20 2013고단3077
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged [Majority fact] around April 2010, the victim C introduced F-si Ga of the wife population G, H 39,172 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) or the above land (hereinafter “the above land”) from D, E, etc., and decided to carry out a sales agency business with the content of selling the above land in the name of (jun Pul Pul monetary source development), which purchased the above land in the name of the victim’s work, and developed it in the name of 1.6 billion won, and conducted land development work, provisional division, and sales work.

The victim asked D and E to sell a part of the above land instead of the expected sale price, and he also sold I (subdivided parcel number after division) out of the above land to J, etc. However, when the balance to be paid to the above F is insufficient, the defendant was introduced through D, and again borrowed 70 million won from K on July 14, 2010 after introducing K as a corporate bond company through the defendant, and as a collateral, the victim set up a collateral security right with the maximum debt amount of 1 billion won on July 14, 2010 with respect to the part of the above food rate of land as a collateral to K on July 14, 2010.

Since then, when the victim came to know of this fact from the above J, etc., he asked the defendant whether only the parcel of the above land was sold by him could not terminate the right of collateral, and the defendant was able to receive the money from the victim as the cancellation of the right of collateral and use it individually by taking advantage of the following circumstances.

【Criminal Facts】

Therefore, on July 2010, the Defendant stated that “The part of a collateral security shall be too negoh; 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the victim, he thought him to use it individually, and he is responsible for the above collateral security by requesting K to do so.

arrow