logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.03.28 2018고단4464
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle for the car of B knife.

On May 5, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at the speed of 03:06, while proceeding the front road of the Jung-gu Busan Metropolitan City C apartment D with the F apartment from the direction of the E Middle School to the F apartment.

At the time, the field is at night and the center line of yellow domin line is installed, so a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and to safely operate the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the front left side of the H&5 vehicle driven by the victim G (Nam, 41 years old), which was driven by the victim G (Nam, and 41 years old), in one-lane opposite to the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, to the front left side of the Defendant’s vehicle. As a result, the Defendant got the victim’s vehicle parked in the front left side of the JW 2wing 2wing F&D truck, which was parked in the lower left side, and the Defendant’s vehicle in the front side of the left side of the JW 5 vehicle owned by the victim’s C&5 vehicle that was parked in the rear side of the vehicle due to the collision with the said vehicle. The Defendant continued to go back to the left side of the Defendant’s LM5 vehicle owned by the victim’s M&D vehicle.

At the same time, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim G, such as salt, tensions, etc. requiring approximately five weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant failed to immediately stop the said vehicle and escape without taking measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though the repair cost of the said 2wing vehicle was KRW 1,842,694, the repair cost of the said 1,842,694, the repair cost of the said 5 vehicle, the repair cost of the said 5 vehicle, and the repair cost of the said 1,408,426, and the repair cost of the said 880,416 vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement about G,O, and P;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. Investigative report-related vehicles;

arrow