A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2014, at around 22:16, the Defendant: (a) made a breathous speech with D while under the influence of alcohol in the C District located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) and (c) made a breathous speech on whether police officers were able to ask for personal information and personal information while drinking in the C District located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (c) made a breath of the E, thereby reducing the breath of the breath cited by the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (a person who has been specially mitigated) in the area of mitigation [a] [a person who has committed a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties] (a person who has been subject to a special mitigation] (a decision of sentence] the Defendant acknowledges his/her mistake; the degree of violence is relatively minor; on the other hand, the Defendant assaults police officers without any particular reason; the Defendant committed an act of assaulting police officers; the State’s legal order and the establishment of the state’s law and order and eradicates the culture of the public authority, etc., a punishment for the obstruction of official duties shall be determined for six months and two years