logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.21 2017나13824
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (except for the part concerning the conclusion) except for the part concerning which the following is written, thereby citing it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(A) With respect to the part of the first instance court's decision, the part of the 7th instance court's decision on February 2, 2007, which the defendant submitted to this court, 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A' 'A

(2) In cases under the preceding paragraph, termination shall become effective after one month has elapsed from the date of receipt by the other party of the notice of termination.

(3) When remuneration for a period is fixed, termination shall take effect upon the lapse of one week after the other party has received a notice of termination.

In the case of an employment contract with monthly remuneration, if one of the parties notifies the termination of the employment contract, the termination shall take effect only after the lapse of the month after the notice of termination.

Therefore, it is reasonable to view that a party to an employment contract as above may not be exempt from liability due to nonperformance of obligation for the period until the notice of termination takes effect, at least, if the party fails to perform his/her obligation until the notice of termination takes effect.

As to this case, No. 6 No. 1, 2, 3, 4.

arrow