logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.02.17 2020고단1833
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"200 Highest 1833"

1. Around 10:30 on December 1, 201, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) while driving a Grand Cross on the front side of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) driving a Grand Cross on the front side along the three-lane line among the three-lane three-lane roads along the four-lane line from D. D., the Defendant was on the part of the victim E (the 41-year-old-gu driver), who was driven along the second line due to an occupational negligence while neglecting the duty of 0.191% of alcohol level during blood while driving the three-lane line while neglecting the duty of her alcohol level; (c) changing the course to the second line due to an occupational negligence; and (d) received the part of the part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driving after the right side of the driver’s vehicle, and then the part of the Defendant’s vehicle was in front of the left-hand part.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s vehicle by occupational negligence as above so that the amount equivalent to KRW 500,000 is equal to the repair cost.

2. The Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) was under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 0.191% from the 1km section around the above temporary roads, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, to the point where the above accident occurred. The Defendant driven the Babro-car under the influence of alcohol leveling from around 1km to the point where the accident occurred.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and time, operated Lone Star Co., Ltd.

around 06:39 September 6, 2018, the Defendant operated the Grand Cross Co., Ltd., which was not mandatory insurance from one member of the Seo-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu as the head of Gyeyang-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

"200 Highest 1833"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiry (Evidence 51 pages) of a medical certificate 2020 high group 3401;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance contracts;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (3) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and each fine shall be imposed on the facts constituting an offense;

arrow