All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of Defendant B’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that Defendant B was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record, it is justifiable for the lower court to reverse the first instance judgment on the grounds that there is no proof of a crime against Defendant A’s charge (excluding the part not guilty of the first instance judgment) and to render a acquittal. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine,

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.