1. Of the 8430 square meters of forests and fields V, Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun, the number of points indicated in the annexed drawings is linked in order to each point.

1. The Plaintiffs, I, and W shared the share of 1/4 shares, respectively, in V woodland 8430 square meters in Hongsung-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun (hereinafter “instant land”).

W died before the filing of the instant lawsuit, and the Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H jointly inherited W’s property.

(3) Around July 2015, when the instant lawsuit was pending, the Plaintiff died on or around July 13, 2015, and A succeeded to the status of I as Defendant J, K, L, M, N, P, P, Q, Q, Q, R, S, T, and U (the shares of Defendant J 6/132, Defendant K, L, M, M, and N 4/132, Defendant P, Q, U, U, and U, and 11/132, respectively).

The Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on the division of the instant land.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 6, Eul 1, Eul 1 through 3 (including each number in case of a tentative number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the plaintiffs can seek a partition against the defendants as co-owners of the land of this case. The plaintiffs and the defendants' co-ownership shares in this case, the location, shape, area, and utilization status of the land of this case, surrounding environment, and the intent of the parties (the deceased I's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant's litigant, E, and F did not raise any objection against the decision substituting conciliation in the same purport as the Disposition No. 1) and all other circumstances, such as the relation between the plaintiffs and the defendants, it is reasonable to divide the land of this case as shown in the Disposition.