logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.30 2017가단5132031
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3), 4, 5, 6, and 1.

Reasons

1. On July 5, 2015, the part on the ship (A) and 3.52 square meters (hereinafter “instant house”) connected each point in sequence to the Defendant, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet, are 3.52 square meters (hereinafter “instant house”) among the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

(B) the lease (hereinafter referred to as “the lease of this case”) with a deposit of KRW 4 million, KRW 320,000 per month, and period of KRW 24 months;

(2) In light of the aforementioned facts, the Plaintiff agreed to deliver the instant house to the Plaintiff by November 30, 2017, and the entire purport of the statements and arguments as stated in subparagraphs 1 and 2 above, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 758,720,00, and the Defendant shall pay KRW 758,720,00, which would be deducted from the instant house due to the Defendant’s failure to pay the rent, etc. on October 30, 2017, and instead, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff more than KRW 758,720,00, which would be deducted from the instant rent, etc. on October 31, 2017 (i.e., delivery of the instant house to the Plaintiff by November 30, 2017; and (ii) the Plaintiff agreed to deliver the instant house to the Plaintiff by November 30, 2017.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow