Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The facts charged were appropriately revised to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense.
At around 00:10 on February 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in “C” in “C, one of which he had a bad horse from her natives, went to the victim E (n, 19 years old) (n, the 19 years old) who was drinking in the table table, and went to the victim E (n, the 19 years old) who was drinking in the table table, caused the victim to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;
1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, diagnostic certificates, investigation reports (investigation into the damaged part);
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 500,000 won for a fine, Article 50,000 won for a period of 50,000 won for a year: The defendant replys to his actions and is against the defendant; the defendant wants to agree with the victim; the defendant has no particular criminal power other than the criminal records for a single-time fine; the defendant seems to have had dolusence, not a conclusive intention on the part of the defendant at the time of the instant case; the defendant