Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served in the position of the head of Yang-rowon B, and was responsible for the safety of the two-age seafarers B at the time of the occurrence of a fire, but instead, the Defendant left the vegetable C (86 tax, female) which is unable to move with the other responsible person due to inconvenience in body without having the other responsible person work in the vegetable, or securing any safety condition.

On October 24, 2016, the Defendant, located in Yangju-si D, destroyed part of the toilet of the first floor of the building due to a cause not attributable within the “Browon” operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant was in a state that he could not move within the two-way sources by leaving the originals with poor body without fulfilling his duty of care in the course of his duties and going out to the outside and going out of the country without fulfilling his duty of care. A victim (86 years of age, women) in a state that he was unable to move within the two-way sources (86 years of age, women) due to a fire, and died during treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some of the statements made by the police in relation to E;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a fire and reporting on internal accidents (verification of hospital medical records);

1. Fire station fire site investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of death, written opinion, and copy of each medical record;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act chosen a penalty, and the choice of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Considering that the bereaved family members of the victim’s reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act do not want the punishment against the defendant, and at the time, the victim’s health condition and the defendant was the first offender who had no previous conviction, the punishment as set forth in the summary order cannot be deemed excessive in light of the defendant’s breach of duty of care due to the victim’s breach of duty of care, and the seriousness of the result resulting in the victim’s death.