logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.09 2016나2073376
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

No. 10 of real estate between K and the defendant was registered as co-owned between the last 2nd e.g., the first e., the first e.g., the second e., the first e., the second e., the second e., the first e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the first e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow