logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2020.05.28 2020고정88
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On May 24, 2011, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts” Even though the Defendant had the record of being punished for drunk driving, the Defendant driven a C-A-hurd-hurd-hurged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purg-purged-purg-purg-ri

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records as a suspect), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: The driving of alcohol is highly likely to cause harm to the life and body of others as well as himself/herself, and the defendant has been punished once before the instant case, and the circumstances favorable to the fact that the driving of alcohol was conducted by drinking prior to the instant case: The defendant's mistake reflects his/her mistake while recognizing the crime; and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, details of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are determined as ordered by taking into account various sentencing conditions as stated in the instant records and arguments.

arrow