Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On August 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:20 on August 12, 2017, opened a 1stro-distance road in front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, opened the 1stro-distance road, and turned to the left at a speed of about 5 km per hour among the two-lanes in the city-interest gate from the Si-Sa apartment off.

At all times, the intersection where signal lights are installed and the left-hand turn is prohibited, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to turn to the left as it is, the defendant's body of the victim D (Woo 67) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the right-hand side of the right-hand side was shocked by the front part of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant.

Ultimately, Defendant 1’s negligence caused injury to the victim, such as knee, knee, and other parts of knee, knee, and tension in need of approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accident scene photographs and diagnostic reports;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1)1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, proviso to Article 3(2)1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant’s negligence was focused on the Defendant’s negligence as to the fact that the Defendant was at the time of driving, because the place of accident was near the Defendant’s residence, and the victim was at the time of driving, due to the fact that the Defendant was at the time of the accident, and the degree of injury for the victim’s additional discovery of symptoms, etc. after the accident is light.

It can not be seen, and is subscribed only to liability insurance.