logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.27 2018노154
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of legal principles)

A. The contents written in the “Emergency” and “D” (hereinafter “each of the instant documents”) as indicated in the judgment of the court below are not about “victim E” as to an individual, not about “victim E”, unless it is intended to inform the illegality of the C Order E.

B. Even if the content of each of the documents of this case pertains to victim E, it does not constitute an insulting speech that may undermine the social evaluation of the victim’s personal value.

(c)

Even if the contents of each of the documents of this case insults victims E, they were distributed only to the members of the clan C who have an interest in the operation of the C clan, so there was no performance.

(d)

Even if the defendant distributed each of the documents in this case and publicly insulting the victim E, it is justified as a legitimate act that does not go against the social norms.

Judgment

In full view of the phrases, such as the illegality of “E of the Chairperson” and the illegality of executives of K, extreme trees sold to E for the purpose of drinking them, “persons who act for the purpose of franchising” (which means 10 pages of evidence), “10 pages of actual execution” (which is the illegal president E daily allowance, and “E” (which means 11 pages of evidence record), and the overall contents of each of the documents of this case as indicated in each of the documents of this case, the expression of “victim” is also included in the contents of each of the documents of this case.

Since the defendant can be fully recognized (the distribution of each of the documents of this case by the police to the paper members was to inform the paper members of the victim E's corruption and inform the victim E of the contents of the illegal act and to inform the paper members of the attendance.

The testimony was made (Evidence No. 104 pages) and the prosecution also distributed each of the documents of this case to inform victims E of the same purpose.

- the statement was made (Evidence 158 pages);

arrow