A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. The Defendant: (a) around August 2015, around 2015, around 2015, purchased opphonephones from B to B in the street near the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-gu, and (b) around 15:00 on the same day, purchased opphones by receiving opphones from B at the direct park parking lot located in the Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-gu.

2. On August 2015, the Defendant administered philophones by drinking the scopon on a coffee with the scopon purchased, as described in the above paragraph (1), in a direct park parking lot located in Cheongcheon-gu Cheongcheon-gu Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the B statement section);

1. Application of the statutes on response to requests for appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Acts on criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reduction area of punishment under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.: The same sentence as the order shall be determined against the defendant within four months and one year and six months, in consideration of the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the Supreme Court in this case, such as the contents and result of the crime for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.; the background of the crime; circumstances after the crime was committed; the self-denunciation; the circumstances after the crime was committed; and the criminal records of the same kind; and the defendant's serious reflects the factors

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.