beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,197,238 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 5, 2016 to August 31, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of premise;
A. At around 15:40 on March 11, 2014, A driven a large bus B (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with three-lanes in front of the D main station in Gwangju mine area C from the south to the black ray. On the other hand, E was driven by a FO2 car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), while driving the FO2 car at the new airport along three-lanes from the new airport to the new zone, and driving the vehicle just enters the intersection beyond the stop line while waiting in front of the green signal in Gwangju mine area, and subsequently, he was in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s left part of the passenger vehicle in front, and then, E was in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front, while driving the vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the Plaintiff, and then driving the vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the GJ, the vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.
The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect
C. After paying the sum of KRW 190,062,460 to G, etc., the Defendant filed a claim for reimbursement against the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff once paid KRW 95,209,730 to the Defendant on June 29, 2015.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 11, video, purport of whole pleadings
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. When displaying the red signal light of the vehicle, vehicles and horses must stop immediately before the stop line, crosswalk, and intersection. In this case, the Plaintiff vehicle exceeded the red signal signal signalling range, and thus, it is deemed that it violated the signal.