logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.06.20 2017고단1520
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Criminal Force of Crimes】 On June 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the same crime at the Ulsan District Court on August 10, 2016, as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.

【Defendant 1, who committed the crime, had been punished twice due to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking), was driving a BL car in the state of under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.115% from the section of about 100 meters from the 100 meters of alcohol level to the front day of the TW 1, which is located in the south-gu air space around 12 April 12, 2017, both the south-gu and the south-gu air space around 268-2 and the same route.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on detection of a person suspected of violating traffic laws (driving), notification on the results of crackdown on driving of alcohol, inquiry into the results of crackdown on driving of alcohol, a statement of the situation of the driver under driving of alcohol, and a report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment to the same type of force);

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment was that the defendant driven the third alcohol, but there was no record of punishment other than a fine for driving under two times the introduction of the crime, the distance of the defendant's driving is not long, and the defendant reflects his mistake, and the punishment is determined as ordered.

arrow