A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 140,000 won in cash in return for sexual traffic from the South Korea, in front of the first stop of Btel in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) made it possible for the Defendant to send to the said C with the said officetel 801, waiting for a female sexual traffic with the Russian nationality, D (D, inn, 27 years old); and (c) made it possible for the Defendant to engage in sexual traffic by sending it to the said officetel 801, which is waiting for by the Russian nationality.

2. On July 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 130,000 won in cash from E who purchased a sex in return for sexual traffic in front of the instant officetel 1 on July 10, 2018; (b) made it possible for E to send the said officetel into the said officetel 613, waiting for F (F, female, 32 years of age) to engage in sexual traffic; and (c) made it possible for E to engage in sexual traffic in the said officetel 613.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against E, C, or F;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. provides for a foreign woman with reasons for sentencing, and it is disadvantageous that the crime and circumstances are not good, such as engaging in business against many and unspecified persons in officetels.

However, it is advantageous to the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, confession and reflects, the period of crime is short, earnings are not large, and there is no record of the crime exceeding the fine.

In addition, the sentencing conditions recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the same sentence as the order.