The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (five years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination elements are recognized as favorable sentencing factors such as the Defendant’s perception of each of the instant crimes and seriously reflects the mistake, the fact that the amount of damage caused by the attack and fraud is relatively minor, the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for sexual crimes, and the Defendant agreed with the victim H after the closing of argument in the trial.

However, the criminal facts and crimes of this case recognized by the evidence, the evidence law and the legal principles reveal that: (a) the defendant demanded that the victim C of mas and girls in an internal relationship be hedging; (b) caused the victim's injury to the house with his her son; and (c) caused the victim's injury to the son and her life; and (d) rape the victim who could not be resisted by continuous violence without confinement; and (b) the defendant committed crimes such as taking the son's son from her son and her son without a driver's license; and (c) the victim and her son were deemed to have suffered severe mental and physical pain; and (d) the defendant did not pay or have received any injury from the victims other than H; and (e) the defendant had been punished by living together with her son before her, and (e) was recognized as having committed crimes that are disadvantageous to the other victims, such as fraud or other types of objective and neutral factors that have been subject to punishment, such as fraud.

The above factors of sentencing and sentencing criteria, sentencing cases for similar cases, age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant, motive and circumstance leading to each of the crimes of this case, the means and consequence of the crimes, and the circumstances after the crimes, shall be comprehensively considered.