logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고단1717
명예훼손등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. At around 13:00 on July 19, 2012, the Defendant asserted that the “Etype hospital” hospital for the victim’s operation “Etype hospital in the window C of Changwon-si, the Defendant did not deliver the first photograph of the photograph taken from the photograph taken by the Defendant upon treatment at the above hospital on or around July 7, 2012, and that the photograph taken by the Defendant was not given to the above hospital, and that “the photograph was not taken in the body, but taken by the hospital, if the photograph was fabricated, it would be the hospital, and would be the hospital with the fraud changed.” The Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business operation by force by preventing other patients from internaling.

B. On July 23, 2012, at around 11:00, the Defendant took care of the employees of the hospital including the above D at the same place as the preceding paragraph, and had the patients return to the hospital by avoiding disturbance, thereby obstructing the victim’s hospital business operation by force.

2. Defamation and interference with business of the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on July 24, 2012, the entrance and surrounding areas of the hospital and the hospital; (b) the victim merely treated the Defendant who suffered from minculation and did not use minculation to the Defendant who suffered from simple mincation; and (c) the Defendant did not remove exculcation photographs taken by the Defendant’s multi-friendly body or deliver them to the Defendant; (d) the Defendant filed a complaint against the E-type project in which fluculous patients were deprived of mincation and the bones were shreed in person by inserting the bones, and removed the exculic photo by first and second xra; and (e) the victim did not take photographs first and second fluculing from the hospital to the date on which 820 days elapsed from that date.

arrow