1. The cancellation of the part against the defendant concerning the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the first instance, and the cancellation part; and

1. The reason why this Court's statement concerning this part of the basic facts is as follows: "......." The reasons why this Court should explain are "........", each "attached Form 5" in the third 16th and the first 38th th st 38th , is the same as the part "1. Basic Facts" in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except in the case where each "attached Form 5" in the third 9th 9th and 7th 4th , of the judgment of the court of first ....

2. The parties' assertion

가. 원고들 1) 이 사건 보도는 영광 법성포의 굴비업체 전부를 지칭하고 있다고 할 것이므로 법성포에서 굴비의 가공판매업을 하고 있는 원고들이 피해자로 특정되었다. 2) 피고는 법성포의 굴비업체들이 아가미 섶간과 해풍건조라는 전통적인 방식에 따라 가공하지 않고 참조기에 소금을 쳐서 냉동하여 만든 것을 해풍에 건조한 것처럼 속여서 판매하고 있다는 취지로 이 사건 보도를 하였다.

However, the report of this part is false because the so-called "refescing companies" of the so-called "refescing companies" did not sell the unfescing refescing so far as the unfescing refescing costs are listed

3. The Defendant reported the instant report to the effect that the Defendant sold 7.5 times see, e.g., field mining expenses without any difference between seeing machines and seeing machines, and takes a wide interest rate.

However, although the so-called "legal so-called Corporation" purchased seeing machine in breath, filtering water, military acid, etc., and the majority of the so-called "mining expenses" did not sell through the department store, the defendant did not conduct an investigation for the legal so-called "legal so-called" companies, although the sales price of the department store includes the profits acquired by the department store, it included the profits acquired by the department store in the interests of the legal so-called "legal so-called" companies, and the seeing price is calculated based on the sales price of the rice at the time of the highest price.