logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.08.28 2014가단21161
부당이득금반환 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 2,031,600 and its related amount are 5% per annum from December 9, 2014 to August 28, 2015.

Reasons

1. Determination as to claims against Defendant B, C, and G

A. On August 22, 2014, the Plaintiff entered all the Plaintiff’s personal information and financial transaction information, such as a security card password and a identification number, at the request of the relevant website without recognizing that it is a forged site after having access to a forged site, which assumes that he/she is a person in charge of our bank. (ii) After that, from August 22, 2014 to August 25, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 4,880,000 to the Korean CF bank account (I) in the name of the Plaintiff in the name of the Plaintiff, and KRW 5,040,000 to the Defendant C’s corporate bank account (J) account in the name of the Defendant C, and KRW 5,000 to the Southern Saemaul Bank account in the name of the Defendant C (K) and KRW 5,960,000 each over three times.

(3) Of the money transferred to the account under Defendant B’s name on August 25, 2014, KRW 2,040,000, out of the money transferred to the account under Defendant B’s name, the amount of cash automatic payments or the amount of cash card payments was paid by Defendant B. KRW 5,040,000, out of the money transferred to the account under Defendant C’s name and KRW 1,900,000, out of the money transferred to the account under Defendant G’s name, was withdrawn immediately after each transfer on August 22, 2014. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff was refunded KRW 2,848,40, out of the money transferred to the account under Defendant B’s name on November 2, 2014, and KRW 4,040,000, out of the money transferred to the account under Defendant G’s name, and KRW 3,040,200,000 from the money transferred to the account under Defendant G’s name [the grounds for recognition, Nonindicted Bank’s submission No. 1,36 I.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion ①, around the other hand, Defendant B, C, and G received remittance from the Plaintiff without any legal cause, and thus unjust enrichment equivalent to the pertinent amount, the remaining money remains after deducting the refund for loss from each remittance amount.

arrow