The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant has led to the confession and reflect of all of the instant crimes; and (b) the degree of damage incurred is relatively heavy; (c) the Defendant has been punished several times due to violence-related crimes; (d) the Defendant has been under the influence of having been punished several times; (c) in particular, if the Defendant choose imprisonment with prison labor by failing to know himself during the period of repeated crime, it is inevitable to sentence the sentence; (d) the quality of the crime is not good; (e) the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and was on patrol, and there is no agreement with the victim; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) other circumstances after the crime are too unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition