logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단380
옥외광고물등관리법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each verdict of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A is engaged in the apartment sale agency and advertising as the representative director of Company B.

No person who intends to display or install advertisements, etc. prescribed by Presidential Decree shall display or report such advertisements, etc. to the competent administrative agency with permission or report thereof, and shall not display or install advertisements, etc. in areas, places or objects prescribed by Presidential Decree in order to preserve scenic landscapes and public morals, prevent harm to the general public, and create a healthy and pleasant living environment,

However, around February 2, 2015, Defendant A installed a banner on the fence where the installation of advertising materials is prohibited without obtaining permission from, or filing a report with, the competent authority on the front side of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, with a size of 4.6m wide and 0.9m wide.

Defendant

A, from this point to the fifth day of the same month, 47 banners were installed in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

(hereinafter “instant banner”). B.

Defendant

B Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) committed an act in violation of the preceding paragraph with respect to the business of the Defendant Co., Ltd., at the time, at the place and time under the preceding paragraph.

2. The instant case is a public prosecution instituted against the installer of an illegally attached banner under Articles 18(1)3, 4(1), and 19 of the former Outdoor Advertisements, etc. Control Act (amended by Act No. 13726, Jan. 6, 2016) (amended by Act No. 13726, Jan. 6, 2016).

The Defendants and their defense counsel asserted that Defendant A, as the representative of Defendant Company, produced the instant banner to J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) and did not directly install the instant banner as shown in the facts charged.

Each written accusation.

arrow