logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.04.21 2017고단893
위계공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 03. 23. 08:13 경 오이도 방면 지하철 4호 선 (3090 호 )에 승차 하여 위 지하철이 서울 강북구 도봉로 198 소재 미아 역을 지날 무렵 ‘ 먼저 출발한 지하철과 간격을 유지해야 하므로 잠시 정차하겠다’ 라는 안내방송을 듣고 화가 난다는 이유로 피고인의 핸드폰으로 서울 메트로 콜 센터에 전화 하여 상담 직원인 C에게 “ 지하철을 폭파시켜도 되나, 지하철을 폭파시켜 버려도 돼!! ”라고 말하였다.

The Defendant listened to the phrase “I must report to the police at the time of explosion” from play C, and ordered C to conduct search and boundary activities, such as searching for the discovery of explosives for about one hour and forty-five minutes, on the following grounds: “I am to clearly talk about the hyp?h, to remove the l's foot subway, to remove l't t't t', to t't t', to t't t't t', to t't t', and to 137 police officers belonging to the Seoul Regional Police Agency, the Gyeonggi Northern Northern Regional Police Agency, and to arrest criminals.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a deceptive scheme, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A internal investigation report (to secure the current status of the mobilization of police forces by suspect A, and the record materials in Seoul metro-mail telephone related to threats to a breadth);

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense of the pertinent Article of the relevant Act and Article 137 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the selection of punishment does not constitute a crime of obstructing the execution of official duties by fraudulent means, since the defendant's defense counsel's defense counsel does not cause or use the defendant's act of this case as a

The argument is asserted.

Interference with the execution of official duties by means of a knife, a deceptive scheme, causes the misunderstanding, mistake, and site of the other party.

arrow