1. From 8,463,226 won to 8,466 won, the Defendant is 65.52 square meters from the building indicated in the separate sheet from December 30, 2019 to 65.52 square meters.

Basic Facts

On June 30, 2019, the Plaintiff leased the instant house to the Defendant with the period of 10,000,000 won for lease deposit, KRW 450,00 per month for rent, KRW 21,00 per month for water supply and septic tanks, KRW 28,00 per month for rent payment, and the period of lease from July 28, 2019 to July 27, 2021.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant lease”). Around September 21, 2019, water leakage and cocoi in the lower end of the kitchen in contact with the toilet (hereinafter referred to as “the first defect”), around December 10, 2019, the instant lease created fung in the wall, tent, and fung in the wall, tent, and the said fung.

(hereinafter referred to as "second defect") Nos. 1 and 2 are not accepted until the date of the closing of the argument in this case.

The defendant did not pay the rent from August 28, 2019 on the ground that the defects of Nos. 1 and 2 were not repaired.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s instant lease agreement is terminated as of December 29, 2019 as of December 16, 2019, if the Plaintiff did not pay the Defendant the overdue rent, water supply and septic tank fee by December 29, 2019.

“Notice” (hereinafter, the Defendant received the declaration of termination of the instant case at that time.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and Eul evidence Nos. 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff asserts that the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of termination of the contract of this case, and sought against the defendant to deliver the house of this case with refund and redemption of the lease deposit of this case.

In regard to this, the Defendant did not pay the tea because the Plaintiff failed to perform the obligation to repair the defects in the first and second instances. Thus, the Defendant alleged that the instant termination declaration on the ground of the delinquency in rent was unlawful and invalid.

Since the duty of the lessor to use and benefit from the object in the lease contract and the duty of the lessee to pay rent for the leased object are in response to each other, the lessor is the object.